[Berlin-wireless] Fwd: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Which image for the Nanostation Loco M2, WAS:Cannot flash UBNT Loco M2

Sven Roederer freifunk at it-solutions.geroedel.de
So Mär 13 00:13:14 CET 2016


Hi,

hier ist noch ein interessantes Posting von Matthias aus der OpenWRT-Liste.
Kernaussage ist, dass für die Lowcost-versionen der Nanostations nicht
die Firmware-version vom Typ "nanostation" sondern von Typ "bullet"
genutzt werden sollten. Da die Bullet-versionen, passend für die LoCos,
auch nur einen Ethernet-port definiert haben.

Evtl. hilft diese Info auch schon gegen die z.Zt. verstärkt auftretenden
Probleme bei der Netzkonfiguration für die Locos.

Wer hat eine Loco, die zur überprüfen bereit steht?

Gruss Sven

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Which image for the Nanostation Loco M2,
WAS:Cannot flash UBNT Loco M2
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:19:21 +0100
From: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer at universe-factory.net>
To: Aaron Z <aczlan+openwrt at gmail.com>
CC: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org>

On 03/11/2016 05:15 PM, Aaron Z wrote:
>  )On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Matthias Schiffer
> <mschiffer at universe-factory.net> wrote:
>> PS. Completely unrelated to this issue: I noticed in your log that you used
>> the wrong image ("nanostation" instead of "bullet") for your Loco. This
>> isn't really an issue, as the nanostation and bullet images only differ by
>> the number of ethernet ports they define, but you'll have a dead "eth1"
>> device. The image "nanostation" should used for the NanoStation (as it is
>> the only device with two ethernet ports), and "bullet" for everything from
>> the AirMax XM series except NanoStation and Rocket (Bullet, Loco,
>> PicoStation, ...)
> So, which should be used for the Nanostation Loco M2 (
> http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-NanoStation-locoM2-2-4GHz-Outdoor/dp/B004EGI3CI/
> ) which has one Ethernet port?
> The one I have is an older (non-XW) device. For CC, I see:
> openwrt-15.05-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-bullet-m-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin and
> openwrt-15.05-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
> I had used the nano build, but it has a non-functional eth1 port.
> 
> Aaron Z

As I wrote, "bullet" is the correct image for all XM devices with one
ethernet port and no USB.

Matthias






-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Binärdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : signature.asc
Dateityp    : application/pgp-signature
Dateigröße  : 213 bytes
Beschreibung: OpenPGP digital signature
URL         : <https://lists.berlin.freifunk.net/pipermail/berlin/attachments/20160313/74a33c24/attachment.sig>


Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Berlin